Bluenose Fou

Original Bluenose under sailI reckon most of you all are familiar with the schooner Bluenose. A Canadian grand banks schooner that was built to beat the Yanks in the races of the 1920’s – and to fish. She served that purpose very well and held the International Fisherman Trophy for 17 years after her launch in 1921. After World War II the era of the fishing schooners was a bygone one. Bluenose was sold in 1942 to work as a freighter in the Caribbean. There she foundered on a reef outside Haiti, January 28, 1946.
She got her name from the nickname for Nova Scotians and has served as sort of symbol or an icon for Canada and specially for the province ever since. Her graceful lines can be seen on the Canadian dime, stamps, in books, as a model, as a beer label and so on.

Beer label. Yes, Schooner Beer was first brewed in the 50’s by the Oland Brewery in Halifax, NS. It still exists today, but the Oland Family sold the brewery to the Labatt brewing Company in 1971.Schooner Beer bottle
However, in 1963 the Oland Family funded the building of a replica of the famous Bluenose, to serve as a promotion ship for their Schooner Beer, which featured a picture of the ship on the label. They put down about 200 000 CAD for the building. Later on she was sold for the symbolic sum of $1 to the provincial government who after a few years of managing the schooner turned it over to the Bluenose II Preservation Trust.
They restored about 20 percent of the  hull between 1994-95. The trust kept on running the schooner, sailing around Nova Scotia in the summer, up till 2005 when she was turned over to the Lunenburg Marine Museum Society, who maintain her today.

A few years ago, Joan Roue, great-granddaughter of William James Roue, who designed the original Bluenose, brought up plans of building a Bluenose III. However, the  provincial government didn’t embrace the project and claimed ownership of the name Bluenose III. Apparently she went ahead and started a fundraising plan to collect $15 million for the building of Bluenose IV, instead. Latest I heard, she had not yet raised the funds.
By the time a third vessel was being discussed, in 2007, Wendy Barnable, spokeswoman for the Department of Tourism, Culture and Heritage, said: “Bluenose II still has plenty of years of sailing left and there’s no need to build another version of the famous schooner.”

Today there’s controversy sparked in Canada, revolving just that very issue.
After discovering that the keel of the Bluenose II was warped, in July last year the provincial and federal government granted a $14.8 million dollar support for its restoration. Well okay, so far so good. What has been the issue here is not so much that the ship needs a restoration and that the government is paying 15 million green ones for it. No, it’s more the issue if it’s really a restoration. The restoration project started in December last year with the first phase – the deconstruction. The show ship was dismantled and apparently 80 percent of the material was feeded in a wood chipper and ended up in a landfill. Ouch!

restoration of the Bluenose IIWhat’s left is merely masts, rigging, sail and iron fastenings. So, is this really a restoration project? All new keel, all new frames, all new hull. Some people are very vocal about it and doesn’t want to call it a restoration at all. Some people call it a new boat and argue that the old one should have ended up in the maritime museum instead of a landfill.
A jocular thing in this story are the discussions about the name, because if it’s not a restoration, she clearly can’t be called Bluenose II anymore. Some of the suggestions I have seen are: Bluenose 2.5, Blewnose Choo, Bluenose III, Bluenose Too.
My own addition to the list features Bluenose 33 1/3 and Bluenose Fou.

However, whichever and whatever… the “restoration” project is now in its second phase – “reconstruction of the hull”, and the frames are coming up quickly. The building, I mean restoration site, in Lunenburg are open for the public. Go check it out if you can.
If you possess a Facebook-account, you can check Bluenose II‘s profile for pictures.
More info and pictures on their website as well:

As far as the beer goes, the label is far better than the beverage itself, which is uncomfortably non-beer tasting and lacks any real spirit what so ever.


5 comments on “Bluenose Fou

  1. There are lots of great web resources through which the restoration can be seen, both live and archived images.

    For live shots from the work site, you can visit and for images from the construction to date, you can visit the website of one of the Lunenburg Shipyard Alliance partners – Covey Island Boatworks – and check out the gallery here: .

  2. woody says:

    Oh the controversy! *shakes head* Besides controversy, I’m at least happy to see ehr being refitted.. ehr.. rebuilt and fitted again? anyway.. I’ll be sure to not try the beer, but support the labeling!

    • Fo'c'sle says:

      Without getting into the controversy too much, the project do help keeping the fine craftsmanship of boat building alive and hopefully gave the chance for some interested people to be involved and learn.
      Well, I don’t want to get you to fear any kind of beer, it’s just that it’s not very beery, you know.
      I want to think it tasted better in the sixties though. (Oh the goodle days are past and gone..)
      And it’s a nice thing to build a boat – even if it is to promote your beer. I’ve seen money being put into worse things, actually I see that every day.

  3. Karin Gafvelin says:

    Yes, this is an interesting topic. I was faced with that issue myself last year when I was involved in saving the old clipper ship City of Adelaide (currently still sitting out in the open in Sunderland, but not cut up yet). I was writing debate articles and such in favour of the plan to make her a museum ship rather that “restoring” her by more or less replacing all, or most of, the wood work, since I felt like it kind of defeated the purpose of saving the ship by deconstructing her. It is indeed a tricky question, and I am still not sure what my opinion is, but I got some interesting responses that made me reconsider my somewhat fundamentalistic view. Here is a link to some different inputs on the subject:

    Byt the way, great blog!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s